Does Solving Problems Improve the Process?
by: Chris Anderson
Are you solving problems or improving the process?
In other words, if you find a problem in a process and implement
change to fix it, then did you improve the process? Well, maybe...
Sure, solving problems may be an important thing to do, but it is
not the same as improving the process. Why is this so?
Solving Problems
Solving problems is more about resolving local issues and fails
to take into account the interactions with other processes or the
system as a whole. The result, fixing one problem may not produce
the desired result and worse, the solution may create an entirely
new set of problems. That’s right, if you have not considered the
effect on other processes in your whole system of processes, then
you may make the situation worse. It’s like driving around in your
car without a map and looking for someplace you have never been. It
takes a lot longer and you may end up in places you don’t want to be
at.
Process Improvement
Process improvement is about resolving global issues or outcomes
for the whole system of processes. It’s about focusing on the
customers’ outcomes. To improve processes, you use a map, a process
map, with a picture of the process interactions, outcomes, and
activities involved. The process map helps you focus on what’s
important and what’s not. The idea is to analyze the impact of any
changes you make on the global outcomes and less on the local
problem.
Process improvement is about prioritizing problems and fixing
only those that improve global outcomes. It is not about fixing any
problem that arises. In fact, you may be better off leaving some
problems as problems because there are more important uses of your
time.
Yet, human nature being what it is demonstrates that people spend
80% of their time on solving problems and only 20% on improving the
process. It’s the old Pareto principle (80/20 rule) again. Solving
problems provides a sense of accomplishment, immediate
gratification, and reward. Most compensation systems are based on
problems solved instead of outcomes achieved.
For example, expenses in a business are considered a local
problem. As a manager, if you reduce your expenses, save money, and
control your budget then most managers would be rewarded for such
good behavior, regardless of the revenue or profit impact of your
action. After all, such outcomes are ’beyond your control’, it’s got
to be a sales or marketing problem if revenue is impacted.
Process Improvement by Design
Process improvement is a result of changes made to a process'
design. Well-designed processes produce outcomes that are expected,
efficient, and keep customers happy. By comparison, solving problems
does not focus on design at all. Instead, the focus is on patching
the current design, reworking unexpected outcomes, or quick fixes to
customer unhappiness. And it never ends. You will be constantly
patching a bad design until the design is changed.
Process Improvement through Prevention
Root cause is what we are looking for to change a bad design.
Solving problems is a reactive approach seeking to understand and
resolve the undesirable event. While, process improvement is a
proactive approach seeking to understand the cause and stop the
reoccurrence of an undesirable event. The only way to stop a
reoccurrence is to change the design itself.
Many businesses solve problems that arise in reaction to
operational events, management directions, tight deadlines, or
complaints. In these situations fixing the problem is all that
matters. There is no time to get at the root of the problem and
prevent it from reoccurring.
Process Improvement through Simplification
Process improvement is about process simplification. Reducing
defects and variance or shrinking cycle times and speeding up a
process involve removing needless activities, time delays or design
flaws. On the other hand, solving problems usually adds steps. If
you feel like you need to add an inspection step or more sign-off
forms then you are problem solving. Problems do not have to occur.
Thinking that they do is a problem solving mentality. Process
improvement is about prevention and avoidance.
Process Improvement produces Long-term Results
Process improvement is about identifying changes worthy of
investment to implement permanently. In contrast, problem-solving
results in short-term solutions due to its narrow focus on local
problems and its "fix it" rather than "prevent it" approach. Even
then, the numerous fixes just don't add up to significant gains.
They are nothing more than isolated solutions with little connection
to the organization’s goals. Problem solving becomes a diversion,
preventing an organization from making impact full changes. For
problem-solving to work, it needs to be a part of process
improvement.
Process Improvement or Problem Solving?
Everyone starts by solving problems. But for lasting change that
impacts the bottom line you will need a systematic approach focused
on the right outcomes.
The steps involved in process improvement:
- Understand the big picture. Before making changes to a
process, you need to understand the whole process from start to
end.
- Identify the critical path. Examine the main activities
between the process's start and end points for weaknesses and
potential problems.
- Prioritize Issues affecting outcomes. The weaknesses
according to their impact on the results.
- Communicate Change. Collect and analyze data to communicate
change.
- Take action. Prevent problems and strengthen weaknesses.
Learn more on process design, implementation and continuous
improvement with a How to Create Well-Defined Processes Class coming
up April 5-6 in St. Louis, MO.
www.bizmanualz.com |